Monday, Apr 21, 2014
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Recent Comments

eaglebeaky - Illinois lawmakers to discuss money for Obama library - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Wall Street was solidly in the Romney/Ryan camp last time, pjohnf. (And assuming he's the nominee, they'll certainly be in Ryan's camp in 2016.) Why is it that you seem to think that they're Obama supporters?
eaglebeaky - Illinois lawmakers to discuss money for Obama library - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
When did presidential libraries start taking this kind of funding? (I always thought they were privately funded... or at least I remember hearing that the Clinton and Bush #43 libraries were being done that way.)
eaglebeaky - Voter rights, crime victim rights amendments set for fall ballot so far - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJo
Off-topic, but just to clarify, I will say that the disabled individuals that I've worked with aren't the least bit interested in free phones or anything like that. (Many of them will never live independently in their own communities; any such "bribes" would be meaningless to them.) Of course there are opportunists who do try to take advantage of every social program under the sun, and…
AYHSMB - Illinois lawmakers to discuss money for Obama library - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2, had libraries built with private funds. I can't believe Soros or Buffett (or the Clinton's ;P) aren't contributing to the bill for Obama. Rahm is even stumping for it, as he says it will be a big tourism money maker. Hey, I'm all for it, if it is. On a side note, I think this is the first presidential…
eaglebeaky - Voter rights, crime victim rights amendments set for fall ballot so far - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJo
I honestly couldn't care less about anybody's party affiliation. This ID issue actually has A LOT to do with poor people, the elderly, and people with disabilities -- regardless of their personal politics. (There are a lot of poor people in the south who are lifelong Republicans.) Arbitrarily-enacted voter ID laws ultimately won't disenfranchise you or me... but they do have a real…

Most Popular

Two die in overnight house fire Updated

Petroleum Marketers, C-Stores, fight proposed Illinois gas tax hikes Updated Video

City department heads attempt to justify budgets to aldermen

Adams Co. Divorces for April, 18 2014

Firefighters and Bus Drivers contracts to go to City Council

Fowler man arrested for meth possession

Home Builders, Illinois House look to weaken Fire Marshal authority

REBEL MEDIA: Yes, Peoria mayor DID sic police on Tweeter Video

Editorials & Opinion

REBEL MEDIA: FCC looking to monitor newsrooms

1 month, 4 weeks ago by Bob Gough

Not no, but Hell no

I would go all Charlton Heston over this. Pry my laptop from my cold, dead hands

From Howard Kurtz, media analyst:

What on earth is the FCC thinking?

The last thing we need is the government mucking around with news content.

The title of this Big Brother-ish effort by the Federal Communications Commission sounds innocuous enough: “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs.” But it’s a Trojan horse that puts federal officials in the newsroom, precisely where they shouldn’t be.

Don’t take my word for it. The FCC says it wants to examine “the process by which stories are selected,” as well as “perceived station bias” and “perceived responsiveness to underserved populations.”

Perceived station bias? Are you kidding me? Government bureaucrats are going to decide whether a newsroom is being fair?

Keep in mind that the commission has the power to renew or reject broadcast television licenses. During Watergate, Richard Nixon’s FCC challenged two TV licenses of stations owned by the Washington Post. So mere information gathering can become a little more serious, given that enormous clout.

As FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai notes in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, the commission “plans to ask station managers, news directors, journalists, television anchors and on-air reporters to tell the government about their 'news philosophy' and how the station ensures that the community gets critical information.” The first test is slated for this spring in Columbia, S.C.

I know that television stations are licensed in the public interest. It’s fair for the FCC to examine how much news a station offers, as opposed to lucrative game shows and syndicated reruns. But the content of that news ought to be off-limits.

The Fairness Doctrine, which once required TV and radio stations to offer equal time for opposing points of view, is no more, and good riddance (since it discouraged stations from taking a stand on much of anything). The Obama administration swears it’s not coming back.

How, then, to explain this incursion into the substance of journalism, which seems utterly at odds with the notion of a free and unfettered press?


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 41 minutes ago

Quincy Police Blotter for April 21, 2014 http://t.co/StF9KQhfnZ
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 16 hours, 40 minutes ago

Arbor Day Foundation names Quincy Tree City USA - Quincy achieved Tree City USA recognition by meeting the program... http://t.co/TfFCAOWaW2
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 16 hours, 53 minutes ago

RT @ShooterMcGavin_: Remember today is Easter, not 4/20. We’re to be honoring Jesus Christ, not Bob Marley.
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 21 hours, 43 minutes ago

IFT launches FutureFood 2050 to highlight solutions to feed 9 Billion http://t.co/Gj1GsFMrCH