Thursday, Mar 5, 2015
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Recent Comments

convoy32 - US clears officer in Ferguson case, criticizes police force - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
WTF! This is so stupid,mike brown deserves what he got period! I guess its OK to just disrespect the store owner,push him out of his way and TAKE what he wanted,he is right where he belongs,in the ground 6ft. under! Oh and his racist uncle says something don't add up well probably because he can't add since he didn't finish school ! DUMB BOY!
WmMunny - Holder: Ferguson police bias stoked distrust, hostility, \'toxic environment\' - Quincy, IL News - Q
As I've said before, people play stupid games and they win stupid prizes. Holder and his kind ...... race baiters and class envy whores.
lingard2 - New security measures at IL Department of Revenue will delay state tax refunds - Quincy, IL News - Q
Delaying the refunds, will give the State of Illinois that much more money to Rob Peter to pay Paul.. I just hope I get mky refund before everything explodesl. LOL
pjohnf - Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle - Quincy, IL News - Quin
Who do you think BATF takes its marching orders from, the tooth fairy?
pjohnf - Senate committee will propose taking $580 million from special accounts - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJo
Is this robbing Peter to pay Paul? Everybody knows government wastes billions of our tax dollars and cutting spending is the best solution but certainly spending our limited tax dollars wisely is a step in the right direction, $37 million for open space land purchases seems stupid with all the other things state government should be doing. The democrats will never give up control of spending because…

Most Popular

Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle

Quincy Steak n' Shake Closes

All aboard? State cuts could mean fewer Amtrak trains

Officer Down Facebook page features Quincy officer

Farha announces run for Adams County State's Attorney

Liberty woman wanted out West

League of Woman Voters Hosting Jail Event

Jay Nixon names longtime aide to temporarily replace Tom Schweich as Missouri Auditor

Editorials & Opinion

REBEL MEDIA: Two aldermen (so far) support privatization

1 year, 1 month ago by Bob Gough

I have two out of 14 responses from the members of the Quincy City Council regarding solving the garbage and recycling problem.

They both support privatization, which is a no-brainer (did I say that?).

I anxiously await to hear from the remaining dozen:

PAUL HAVERMALE

This is a part of a reply I sent to a constituent, I have modified it somewhat but it states my views on the garbage issue, sorry for the length. Please forgive my cut and paste but this illustrates my feelings on the issue as well as anything. I do ask, if you use all or part of this let people know I did send this in an e-mail to a resident, full disclosure.

My preferred course would be a complete privatization of waste hauling. I would vote to simply pick a day, with ample warning and planning, to stop this as a City service, in total, and allow residents to contract with licensed waste haulers for service directly. Full privatization would allow people to pick their level of service, to recycle or not, their preferred tote size or no tote, frequency etc. and at a cost they are comfortable with. It also allows companies that are much more efficient than the City to supply the service. It would allow the City to stick to areas of service that citizens can not get anywhere else, i.e police and fire protection, infrastructure maintenance, that we are more efficient at providing.

Failing my preferred course, looking at the financial outlook for Quincy, I would support the program originally proposed by the Mayor. A City wide contract with a private hauler, billed by the City. The program proposed actually allows for more recycling as additional items, i.e. glass, expanded plastics, would be accepted and a larger recycling tote employed. The program would cost residents a fixed $13.20 per month for a period of ten years, no surprises for us residents and fixed financials for all involved. It is not true privatization as I see it, but a step in the right direction. This option would, for the most part, take the City out of the business of waste removal. 

The problem I have with the most recent proposal, raise stickers and charge a fee to haulers, is that it fixes nothing, it is another band aid approach to addressing the real issues and challenges we face. We will have to escalate sticker prices every year to keep up financially and it does nothing to curb future legacy cost. Not to mention that, at some point, we all have to decide what services the City can and should provide. We have an aging infrastructure that will require additional and escalating investment of funds just to keep up with maintenance, not to mention major street repairs that are needed and we lack the funds to address those repairs. Do we lower the level of Police and Fire protection? We have CSO sewer issues that could cost us tens of millions of dollars fix, how do we pay for that? It is clear that to continue handling City affairs as we have in the past is unacceptable moving forward. We have to look for new ways to provide and pay for services the City is best at without breaking the bank or taxing ourselves at unsustainable levels. Changing how we do garbage may not be "the" answer but it is an answer and a step towards addressing financial issues and prioritizing what services the City is to provide in the future  

I also feel that recycling is very important both for the environmental side and from a financial side. One thing I think that has been overlooked is fact that any private hauler option actually expands the list of recyclable material, namely glass and expanded plastics. Granted the major incentive to recycle may be reduced, but I believe many people, like myself, would continue to recycle as much as we can, if recycling is available I will use it.


MIKE REIN

I do not see any compelling reason for the program to stay as it is. The city should manage the contract of a private hauler. We should be able to provide 2 different rate schemes, (large and small amounts). Garbage and recycle wheeled totes should be provided.

This should be subsidized by the grf (General Revenue Fund-BG), but perhaps by a smaller amount than currently.

In comparison, this approach is cheaper, healthier, safer, and more attractive than rat control.

I know this is a big change and most people abhor change. But it will be ok. You will grow accustomed to the new way of doing away with your garbage. This approach is necessary. What we have today is no longer going to work. The cost structure is unsustainable. The risk of injury is too great. We are not pioneers here. This process is being implemented all across America. This approach is state of the art and best practice.

 


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 2 hours, 12 minutes ago

Rauner renews call for union changes during Peoria visit http://t.co/gQmHvfKp5l
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 2 hours, 12 minutes ago

Holder: Ferguson police bias stoked distrust, hostility, 'toxic environment' http://t.co/IiFgGi10nJ
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 3 hours, 9 minutes ago

Patio re-opens - Restaurant closed since Dec fire http://t.co/bb80Ggji8t
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 4 hours, 11 minutes ago

QPD make Child Porn arrest - Crime Stoppers tip led to arrest http://t.co/aBThriuL6I