Tuesday, Mar 31, 2015
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Recent Comments

QuincyGuy - New jail or no new jail? - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
You can pay some now or you can pay MORE later. Kicking the can down the road is what got the jail in the shape it's in now. Kicking the can down the road Is what got the school buildings in that shape. Kicking the can down the road Is what got Illinois in the shape it is now. Someone needs to "suck it up and accept the fact that the problem needs to be fixed now, not down the road". We need…
migraine_in_qcy - Child shot and killed in Quincy - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
There are plenty of white kids east of 18th, and plenty of them are little thieves, vandals and druggies. I don't see how it would matter in what part of town this happened or what color of skin the victim has.
SilenceDogood22 - New jail or no new jail? - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
It is clearly an opinion piece. I'm not bashing QJ for publishing this as news, I think there are people who will read this and take it as news, since it's posted on a news site (even though it's under the opinion page). Most people won't take the time to discern. I would honestly like to see a local journalist do some good solid research (investigative journalism) on this topic…
GuyFawkes10 - New jail or no new jail? - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
How did a response that I did not type end up in my post? Is this a new feature. I actually was defending you by making the point that it was not a news story. I hoped that Silence would have come to that conclusion after I asked question.
whhm - Child shot and killed in Quincy - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
There are too many kids in our society in general being ignored, unsupervised, or otherwise neglected. Whether because of broken families, no father figures or other positive influences, working single parents who don't have the time (or don't make the time), being raised by grandparents who don't have the energy, etc., these kids are left to their own devices when it comes to school…

Most Popular

12 yr old boy shot and killed Sat morning Updated

Reward now offered for info on shooting of Quincy 12 yr old

Tracy vs Sullivan in 2016?

Moore on new Jail: “My support is as a taxpayer”

Wagner and Griggs capture state title

Schock says he leaves Congress with sadness, humility

Fishing For Freedom Registration Now Open

Parents want ability to opt kids out of state tests

Editorials & Opinion

REBEL MEDIA: Appeals court cuts access to White House visitor logs

1 year, 6 months ago By Eric Boehm and Earl Glynn, Watchdog.org

The “most transparent administration in American history” has won another victory for secrecy

The “most transparent administration in American history” has won another victory for secrecy.

A three-judge panel in U.S. Appeals Court ruled in favor of the Obama administration on Friday in an open-records case dealing with White House visitor logs.  The court ruled that the logs, kept by the U.S. Secret Service, are not covered by the federa lFreedom of Information Act, or FOIA, overturning a U.S. district court ruling that said they were.

Though Secret Service “agency records” can be subject to FOIA laws, the panel ruled unanimously that the visitors logs to the White House do not count as such.

Since Congress specifically exempted the president’s schedule and calendar from the FOIA law, the same practice should apply to the Secret Service’s records of visitors to the White House, Judge Merrick B. Garland wrote in the court’s opinion.

“At the bottom, we do not believe Congress intended that FOIA requesters be able to obtain from the gatekeepers of the White House what they are unable to obtain from its occupants,” he wrote.

However, the appeals court also ruled that that records of visitors to offices on the ground of the White House — such as the Office of Budget and Management and theCouncil on Environmental Quality — were subject to the FOIA law and must be disclosed.

Judicial Watch, a conservative activist group, was the plaintiff in the case.  They were seeking the full list of visitors to the White House during the first seven months of President Barack Obama’s first term, including visitors who met with the president and those who met with his top staffers.

Tom Fitten, president of Judicial Watch, said the appeals court ruling “punches another hole in the Freedom of Information Act.”

A president that doesn’t want Americans, under law, to know who his visitors are is a president who doesn’t want to be accountable,” Fitten said.

The case began in 2009 when Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information request for the White House visitor logs from Jan. 20, 2009, through Aug. 10, 2009.  The U.S. Secret Service, which creates and maintains the visitor logs, denied the request.

In district court, a judge sided with Judicial Watch and ordered the White House to turn over most, but not all, of the visitor logs.

Since September 2009, the White House has released visitor logs to the public, but so far has refused to make public the logs from the administration’s first six months.

Judicial Watch is “strongly considering” an appeal to the most recent ruling, Fitten said.

When he took office, Obama promised to run the most transparent administration in American history — a statement he has often repeated (as recently as last month) while simultaneously engaging in legal battles to keep records secret and to punish those who leak information to the media.

But the battles between media and the White House over visitors logs are nothing new.

In the 1996 investigation of President Bill Clinton, Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr scrutinized visitor records that showed Monica Lewinsky may have visited the White House 37 times.

Congressional investigators sought White House visitor records in 2001 to resolve discrepancies in testimony over pardons issued by President Clinton on his last day in office.

In 2006, President George W. Bush attempted to put visitor records outside the FOIA process by quietly signing an agreement with the Secret Service declaring such records were White House presidential records, not Secret Service agency records.

Lawsuits filed from 2006 to 2009 by the Washington Post and the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) attempted to force disclosure of visitor records by the White House.

Mostly because of the CREW lawsuits, the White House announced a voluntary disclosure policy four years ago Wednesday that started the monthly releases in Dec. 2009.

When the Obama administration started the voluntary release of lists visitors from Jan. 20, 2009 to Sept. 15, 2009 were not included.  Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in Dec. 2009 to force the release of all records from that period.

New releases of visitor records occur on the last Friday of the month with information from three months before.  The latest release was on Friday with visitors listed from May 2013.


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 6 hours, 29 minutes ago

U.S. signed agreement with Mexico to teach immigrants to unionize http://t.co/8JgIxWShhT
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 6 hours, 29 minutes ago

One shot dead at Fort Meade after trying to enter NSA gate http://t.co/i4N63407WN
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 8 hours, 29 minutes ago

LaTour steps down as QU tennis coach - Has coached both men’s and women’s programs since 2000 http://t.co/YasrpG7U9b
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 13 hours, 29 minutes ago

Doane Announces Planting Estimates http://t.co/ueH0rY0TFd