by DTN AgDay
Wednesday, Nov 26, 2014
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Recent Comments

Stupid_Dems - Debate continues on how to go about building Quincy\'s new schools - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal
The voters who approved this referendum also expected the construction work and engineering work to be LOCAL. But the Board has went out of town many times over the years most recently they went to Rockford for their printer business. They don't mind taking money from the local taxpayers but don't seem to feel the local folks are good enough to provide the services needed. Hannibal had no…
LNeck2012 - Debate continues on how to go about building Quincy\'s new schools - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal
Well let's look at this. A failed construction worker and a a total tool bag want to hire a construction manager knowing full well that there would be no point to it, especially when they're from out-of-town, because we have plenty of firms here that can handle it. And they did this just a few months before they're up for re-election? Leroy Jethro Gibbs doesn't believe in coincidence,…
GuyFawkes10 - Jail Committee to draft ¼ per cent sales tax ballot resolution - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
Round it up to 15% and do away with IRS
migraine_in_qcy - Jail Committee to draft ¼ per cent sales tax ballot resolution - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
Make it big enough to house all our criminals instead of releasing and re-arresting them. It's probably cheaper to keep them in a jail than what it costs to support them while they're out committing more crimes.
migraine_in_qcy - Jail Committee to draft ¼ per cent sales tax ballot resolution - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
I love the thumbs-down without a dissenting comment. "I disagree completely with what you just said, but I have no idea why and can't formulate an argument in response!"

Most Popular

Man arrested for financial exploitation of the elderly

Entrup files to run for Alderman on Quincy City Council Updated

Quincy man wounded while deer hunting

Quincy School Board proposes $33.63 million tax levy

Quincy Regional Airport makes another late season push for 10,000 departures Video

Quincy City Council votes to sell defaulting loans

Quincy Public Schools involved in an ongoing investigation

Quincy School Board to discuss building project with out-of-town contractor

Crop insurance defense: assess your risks

8 months, 3 weeks ago by DTN AgDay

Farmers nervous about a slew of weather issues

Farmers nervous about a slew of weather issues this spring expect to lock in higher insurance levels. Others are bracing for the normal damage from hail or just setting a foundation in the event of a sudden catastrophe. Most of the U.S. spring-planted crops have until March 17 to be signed up for crop insurance coverage, but what choices growers make depend on their own individual risk and willingness to bear it.

"Last year, we went to 85% coverage for the first time and we'll probably do that again," said Terry Jones, of Williamsburg, Iowa, who farms around 6,000 acres with his brother. "The difference between 85% coverage and 75% coverage was about $100 per acre more revenue." That could be critical, given that subpar moisture levels are Jones' big concern.

Dave Dvorak in West Liberty, Iowa, bumped up his coverage last year for the first time to 85% from 80% because he saw the possibility of prices going down. This year he plans to repeat the high coverage, not because of the price risk, but because his subsoil moisture is depleted. "We have adequate soil moisture in the first two feet, but below that there's nothing," said Dvorak.

To keep costs manageable at the higher coverage, many farmers are choosing the more subsidized enterprise units versus optional units. The federal government subsidizes 53% of the enterprise unit premium at the 85% coverage level compared to a 38% subsidy for optional unit premium for 85% coverage. The enterprise unit factors the loss of revenue across all your fields of the same crop in that county when calculating your indemnity payment. With the optional unit, you can insure each field.

"I worry more about a catastrophic loss across my operation than a field-by-field loss. So, I go with the enterprise units because they are so much cheaper," explained Jones.

It all depends upon the type of risk you're willing to carry, said Charmain Nelson, Texas Farm Credit Services crop insurance specialist. "Generally, Texas farmers carry 70% coverage. This year, we've had some bump up to 80% coverage, but that's still rare. Farmers in Texas generally pay $13 to $20 per acre in crop insurance premiums," Nelson said. In contrast, an Illinois corn grower with a 186-bushel Trend-Adjusted Yield and enterprise unit coverage will pay about $21 per acre for 85% coverage this year, a rate Southerners can only admire from afar.

One young southern Texas sorghum and cotton grower went to 80% coverage on his cotton ground to better manage his risk on his mostly rented acres. The maximum coverage level for cotton and corn is 85%. The maximum coverage for grain sorghum is 75%. Traditionally on his cotton acres, he bought 75% coverage using optional units. But this year, he increased his cotton acreage coverage level and switched to enterprise units. This saved $10 an acre compared to the lower coverage on optional units for his cotton ground.

For lower-risk grain sorghum acres, the young farmer bought 70% coverage using enterprise units. "Even when we have a complete drought and get zero cotton yields, the grain sorghum ground will have half a crop. I view my crop insurance on grain sorghum as catastrophic coverage at the lowest cost I can get," he explained. The federal government subsidizes 80% of the premium cost for 70% coverage on enterprise units.

Sam Simmons also farms in southern Texas, but at 57 years old, can afford to take more risk on his cotton ground, so he justifies having a lower coverage level than young farmers trying to get established.

It's like having a higher deductible with a lower annual payment, he reasoned. "My main concern is a catastrophic loss caused by a hurricane or tropical storm late in the season. I buy 60% coverage on my upland cotton and expect to cover 90% of my input costs." He can afford to "self-insure" smaller losses and said, at levels above 65% coverage, the higher premium cost of insurance is close to his actual benefit if he would incur a loss.

"My strategy is if I have a total loss to be able to survive until the next year," said Simmons. "If you have continuing crop insurance claims in my area, you're not going to make it."

While using enterprise units is less expensive, it depends on how uniform your fields are, and whether that is the best option for your farm. Some of Dean Taylor's central Iowa corn and soybean fields within a mile of each other have a great variation in yield, depending on the weather. In dry years, the Prairie City, Iowa, farmer may collect insurance on his ridge areas. While in wet years, he may have a level field wiped out by floods.

"It depends on the risk of your farm," said Taylor, who buys option-unit coverage and additional hail/wind/fire insurance.

Fire is one of his main concerns. These past dry summers, central Iowa has had some fires started in rural areas and he also has land that butts up to a national wildlife refuge which has controlled grassfires every year.

Hail is more of a risk for the Safraneks who irrigate corn in central Nebraska. "Our philosophy is to buy the cheapest multi-peril crop insurance in case of some unforeseen catastrophe and ramp up hail insurance, which is our main risk," said Craig Safranek in Merna, Neb. "Droughts don't affect us much except in the dry corners of our pivots, and usually the higher corn prices resulting from a drought more than makes up for that loss. Because we irrigate, we rarely have yield losses deep enough to collect on multi-peril insurance. But hail can totally wipe out a field in minutes."

Given that many growers will be bargain hunting this year, Iowa State Extension specialist Steve Johnson recommends all farmers look into the Trend Adjusted Yield option. Using a typical central Iowa farm with an actual yield of 175.5 bpa, Johnson applies the Trend Adjusted yield factor and the farm's yield shoots up to 194.2 bpa.

"It's a pretty good deal for the farmer," said Johnson. "He can stay at a higher subsidized coverage level and still get more of his yield covered than before."


From the Newsroom

Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 2 hours, 47 minutes ago

RT @John Sexton: Yesterday, Ezra Klein insinuated Wilson was lying. Vox's top story. Thousands spread it. Later Klein acknowledged he was wrong. Oops!
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 3 hours, 3 minutes ago

RT @Ben Shapiro: So a black man robs a store, tries to grab a cop's gun, charges the cop, and gets shot -- and our lesson is that America is racist.
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 3 hours, 3 minutes ago

@MHopfWHIG There's never a problem with ham unless you run out.
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 5 hours, 5 minutes ago

RT @Missourinet: AG Holder wants to look at something else in Ferguson http://t.co/kfinJ92Ne3