Saturday, Oct 25, 2014
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Related Headlines

Moody’s says Illinois Supreme Court ruling is ‘credit negative’ for state

Recent Comments

ONCEMORE1 - Quinn, Durbin to drop in Monday for Port Authority announcement - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.co
If we held elections every year, we'd get a lot more money!!
qfingers - GREDF supports Quincy School Building Referendum - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
And for a differing view...the largest public works project since the federal highway system...and they aren't sure why elementary kids improved but high schoolers didn't. Except they suspect it's because the younger teachers were attracted to the new elementary schools. http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2012/08/14/la-unif...
GoSalukis - GREDF supports Quincy School Building Referendum - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
I didn't even see Jesus on the far right at a first glance! Great observation!
LeroyTirebiter - GREDF supports Quincy School Building Referendum - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Why would anyone want to actually investigate something by checking facts? It is so much easier to just press "share" or "forward" and keep spreading those rumors and lies. Or for some of the "trolls" - more fun to just say outrageous things to get a reaction.
gizzard93 - Quinn, Durbin to drop in Monday for Port Authority announcement - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.co
Looks like some one is going to try to buy some more votes with our money.

Most Popular

School Board to outline plans for savings, old buildings if referendum passes

Adams Co. Divorces for 10/24

Illinois Early Voting starts: Cook County ballot box tries to cast GOP votes for Democrats

Bill Clinton to address workers at pro-Quinn rally

Quincy School Board pledges to reinvest savings from new buildings

Several honored during C-SC Homecoming

Quincy man accused of theft from elderly woman

Man arrested for performing lewd acts near school

Candidates need to address pensions

3 months, 2 weeks ago Christopher Z. Mooney, The News-Gazette

It is underfunded by probably more than $100 billion

From Christopher Z. Mooney, The News-Gazette:

You may not have noticed, but on July 3, the Illinois State Supreme Court dealt a body blow to the state's body politic.

The case was Kanerva vs. Weems. You can be forgiven if it escaped your attention — most of the mainstream media missed it or buried it (although The News-Gazette had excellent coverage of it). But Kanerva vs. Weems will have a major impact on the state's finances for a generation. As such, it should also have a major impact on the fall's gubernatorial campaign debates. That is, if the candidates can get past their watches, personal income tax strategies, and minor professional peccadillos.

As you know, decades of underfunding and overpromising by state policymakers has threatened the solvency of Illinois' state public pension systems. It is underfunded by probably more than $100 billion. That's a big number — by far the biggest in the nation. It is approximately enough money to operate the entire state government — prisons, parks, state police, and everything else — for three years. Public pension debt has contributed heavily to the recent bankruptcy of Detroit and other local governments, so policymakers and the bond rating agencies (who determine how much the state pays to borrow money for new roads, bridges, and schools) are very concerned with this.

But as Bruce Springsteen once wrote, this is "a debt that no honest man can pay."

So in 2012 and 2013, after much political angst and drama, the General Assembly and Gov. Pat Quinn adopted two measures designed to address the problem. To simplify, they eliminated free health insurance for retirees, and they made major changes in the retirees' annuity payouts. They argued that these reforms solved the pension problem, and Gov. Quinn touted pension reform as one of the central accomplishments of his administration.

The only problem was the Illinois State Constitution. And in Kanerva vs. Weems, the state Supreme Court just reminded the governor and General Assembly of that.

Article VIII, section 5 of the State Constitution states that:

Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.

But didn't the two pension reform bills effectively "diminish or impair" pension benefits? A common-sense answer from reading this section would be, "yes." But the General Assembly and governor pushed a different reading, one that was so continually repeated by them that the media and most commentators bought into it.

It was up to the state Supreme Court to say that the emperor had no clothes.

Kanerva vs. Weems dealt with the more minor of the pension reforms — making retirees pay health insurance premiums. Many policymakers argued that certainly this was somehow separable from "pension benefits" to the extent that the court would allow it to be cut, even if it disallowed cuts to the annuities. In fact, the argument was made that if the court threw out the annuity changes, these premiums might be to barter with retirees for other cuts.

Click Here to Read Full Article


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 19 minutes ago

Kahn named to QU Board of Trustees http://t.co/DDxJSFzNTU
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 19 minutes ago

Quinn, Durbin to drop in Monday for Port Authority announcement http://t.co/kLNQRJLgkp
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 11 hours, 15 minutes ago

RT @williamfleitch: You know, for living in such a cool, diverse city, San Franciscans sure do lose their sh-t when they see Steve Perry or…
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 11 hours, 16 minutes ago

RT @SharylAttkisson: wonder why pres. obama would exert exec. privilege to keep secret their emails about my news reports and FOI requests?