Thursday, Oct 23, 2014
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Related Headlines

Quincy man accused of theft from elderly woman

EPA Sued by Natural Defense Council Over Enlist Duo

QPD investigating wheelchair ramp theft

REBEL MEDIA: Guest Op-Ed on Missouri and the EPA

QPD warns of IRS targeting scam

Recent Comments

Loverofblues - REBEL MEDIA: So I have a sign in my yard - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
35 years for teaching.
cih8920 - Despite record yields for farmers, Titan\'s Taylor sees down year for tires in 2015 - Quincy, IL New
Titan tractor tires have a very poor track record in the last few years and it is evidently starting to show up in Titans pocketbook.
RUHEARINGVOICES - Illinois Early Voting starts: Cook County ballot box tries to cast GOP votes for Democrats - Quincy,
...and in Adams County I was required to show a photo ID to vote early even though the statute was amended effective July 1st to eliminate that requirement for 2014 only. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp... middle of para (b).
CoolEdge - Despite record yields for farmers, Titan\'s Taylor sees down year for tires in 2015 - Quincy, IL New
370-400 bushels per acre? National average is supposed to be a record at 172, but are they making 370 even in the irrigated bottom ground? We had lotsa rain and a lot of double ears filled out ... but the average is only 10 bushels higher. Of course most of those extra bushels are probably sold at $3, and they are looking at under $3 next year. Most farmers already made a lot of purchases with…
CoolEdge - REBEL MEDIA: So I have a sign in my yard - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Ellington is concrete, doesn't seem "temporary". If the roof is an issue, put some pretty metal gabled roofs over the thing. HVAC is the issue? ... how can it be more for new units than a new building with new HVAC? They could even add a new building behind the old(er) building. The best sales point to me is in attracting industry to the area, which wants to attract individuals, who want good…

Most Popular

Authorities make meth bust on Madison

Adams Co. Divorces for 10/17

Nursing unions call for better Ebola preparedness

School Board to outline plans for savings, old buildings if referendum passes

Despite record yields for farmers, Titan's Taylor sees down year for tires in 2015

Tournear Promoted to JWCC Nursing Admin Chair

QU to Host Science Family Fun Night

Bill Clinton to address workers at pro-Quinn rally

EPA regs threaten to close coal-fired power plants, but some states push back

4 months, 2 weeks ago by Eric Boehm, Watchdog.org

Missouri is one of a handful of states already working to undermine some of the EPA’s regulatory power before the new rules were announced Monday

For 60 years, the power plant on the outskirts of the tiny Missouri hamlet of Chamois turned mountains of coal into cheap electricity.

Last year, the plant closed its doors.

“It’s just really kind of sad, honestly. It’s just one more thing that means fewer jobs for people out here,” said Diane Martellaro, who co-owns a marble and granite business in Chamois, a tiny dot on the map with a population of about 400 along the banks of the Missouri River, about halfway between St. Louis and Jefferson City. 

The town’s population has since declined, she said.

The Union Pacific train line that used to supply the plant with coal no longer runs through town, and the local school will probably have to close soon because the power plant provided most of the necessary tax revenue to keep it running.

Changing market forces — such as the growth in natural gas supplies for other power plants — factored in the decision. But the cost associated with updating the older facility to meet future regulations on emissions from coal power plants was the “major factor” behind the closure, said the company that owned the plant.

Central Electric Power Cooperative believed it would cost $14 million or more to meet the new emissions standards being crafted by the Environmental Protection Agency,according to a statement announcing the closure.

Monday, the EPA officially unveiled those new regulations. The scenario in Chamois might soon be playing out over and over again across the Midwest, home to most of the states with the highest dependency on coal-fired power plants.

The new regulations aim to cut power plants’ carbon emissions by 30 percent by 2030, with specific targets for each state.

The federal government is pitching the new policy as a way to unify the efforts of some local areas and promising that better emissions standards will improve public health and the environment.

But the economic consequences of forcing coal-fired power plants offline will stretch far beyond the immediate effects in Chamois.

For Missouri, a state that gets 82 percent of its electricity from coal power plants, the regulations could be particularly onerous — costing not only jobs for the workers at soon-to-be closed plants but higher costs for businesses that will no longer have access to the cheap power from the coal-fired plants.

Missouri is one of a handful of states already working to undermine some of the EPA’s regulatory power before the new rules were announced Monday.

A bill passed last month by the Missouri General Assembly would give the state’s Air Conservation Commission the ability to develop state-level emissions standards in place of the new federal rules. Unlike the new standards being pushed by the EPA, the state agency would be required to take into account job losses and economic consequences such as higher energy bills.

The bill got bipartisan support in both chambers of the state Legislature and is awaiting a signature from Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat.

“The actions of the Obama administration make it clear that they intend to wipe out coal as an energy source. This would be a misguided and costly action that would leave Missouri’s business and individual energy consumers on the hook for massive rate increases,” said Daniel Mehan, president and CEO of the Missouri Chamber of Commerce, which supported the bill.

Missouri isn’t alone. Neighboring Kansas, which relies on coal for 63 percent of its electricity, has approved similar legislation.

What we’re saying is, Let us handle greenhouse gas emissions. We think we can do it more effectively than you can at the federal level, and we want to look at all factors, including economic,” Gov. Sam Brownback said when he signed the bill into law in April.

It’s the age-old battle between states and the federal government for control of important policy.

The EPA seems willing to give states a seat at the table in the new rule-making process. The rules issued Monday would allow each state to make its own plan to meet federally determined carbon emission standards. The states will have one year to make a plan and get it approved by the federal agency, which will then monitor their progress.

In Chamois, that battle has already been decided, yet hundreds of other coal-fired power plants across the Midwest will hang in the balance.


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 1 hour, 3 minutes ago

Court-appointed monitor ordered for IDOT hiring http://t.co/B4kLkltKDn
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 2 hours, 49 minutes ago

RT @ILCampaignCash: All in!! $50,000.00 from Citizens for John Cullerton to Taxpayers for Quinn. http://t.co/TUWN6OwsXS
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 3 hours, 32 minutes ago

RT @lincoln_elbe3: Qhs soccer game on Quincy journal! #LG #qhs
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 7 hours, 1 minute ago

Sun-Times reporter quits; Cites lack of support from paper following stories on Rauner http://t.co/vaJDsirHJF