Thursday, Jul 24, 2014
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Related Headlines

Moody’s says Illinois Supreme Court ruling is ‘credit negative’ for state

Candidates need to address pensions

Illinois lawmakers propose fix to pension overhaul

Interest on Illinois' unpaid bills reached $318M

Finally, IL (almost) agrees with taxpayers about pensions

Recent Comments

supportu - Schoenakase on WTAD\'s Mary Griffith Show - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Jonathan who you claim was involved with the levee get your facts straight he had nothing to do with the levee. And the school was as a minor 30 years ago why don't you reveal your real name and let's see if you have any skeletons in your closet that you are hiding
LNeck2012 - Schoenakase on WTAD\'s Mary Griffith Show - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Obviously you weren't listening closely. I'm paraphrasing here, but when Mary brought up "what if there aren't enough people willing to volunteer," he replied with "then we can look at the budget and consider buying a shuttle to pick up people to take them to vote." He mentioned it, it just kind of got muddled in with the rest of his cockamamie ideas, or the ones he took word for word…
gothamtroll - Schoenakase on WTAD\'s Mary Griffith Show - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Jeffrey Scott was his born name. Brother of infamous James "Jimmy" Scott who compromised Mississippi levee in 1993. They set fire to Webster school in 1989. Other alias Jeffrey Schoenakase.
yesqcy - Schoenakase on WTAD\'s Mary Griffith Show - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Lets call him by his real name, Jeff Scott. Anyone remember hearing anything about a levee brake in West Quincy about 21 years ago? Why on earth would Jeff run for any office and keep dredging his and his families past up? I don't understand why he hasn't moved from the area,, country for that matter..
supportu - Schoenakase on WTAD\'s Mary Griffith Show - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
I think that it was misquoted about getting people to the polling places. He never mentioned anything about purchasing a shuttle bus to transport people to vote. I believe he meant to find volunteers or people with their own cars who could possibly be reimbursed as they compensate those working the voting polls. Not one time did I hear anything mentioned about any type of taking county money to buy…

Most Popular

Intimidation from Durbin?

Quinn anti-violence spending didn’t pull big votes

Woman dies after SUV and motorcycle collide

Armed Robbers at Large in Quincy Updated

Adams Co. Divorces for 7/23

Bickhaus named to Mercantile Bank Board

Rural Quincy man found to be growing marijuana

Arrest made in Keller Marina boat theft

Does Illinois Supreme Court decision doom pension reform?

2 weeks, 6 days ago rebootillinois.com

Ruling states that retiree benefits can't be diminished

From rebootillinois.com:

The state’s new pension reform law could be in danger under an Illinois Supreme Court decision that indicates justices see no room for re-interpretation of the Illinois constitution’s pension protection clause.

By a 6-1 decision, the court ruled that health insurance benefits promised to state retirees should be considered pension benefits and, as such, are protected from any reduction by a clause in the state constitution that states, “Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.” (The full decision is posted below.)

The ruling strikes down as unconstitutional a 2012 law that increased health insurance premiums for government retirees. The law established emergency rules that could be invoked “to facilitate the maintenance of the program of group health benefits.”

The emergency was that the premiums paid by retirees were insufficient to maintain the group health plan in which the retirees were enrolled and the state could not afford to finance it.

But the court said the state’s ability to pay is irrelevant. Relying on both the constitutional protection clause and the debate at the 1970 constitutional convention from which the clause evolved, the justices said the state is prohibited from reducing the benefits.

“Defendants contend that their position is supported by the debates at the constitutional convention preceding the adoption of article XIII, section 5. This contention is unpersuasive,” writes Justice Charles Freeman, who penned the decision for the majority. “…In light of the constitutional debates, we have concluded that the provision was aimed at protecting the right to receive the promised retirement benefits, not the adequacy of the funding to pay for them.”

That ruling could blast an added $64 million hole in the state’s already unbalanced budget, noted Sarah Wetmore, Vice President and Research Director for the Civic Federation, a nonpartisan fiscal research organization.

“The Civic Federation is disappointed,” she said. “We supported the changes the state made to its state retiree program to end free health care because we thought that would make it more sustainable over the long term.”

Many observers said the July 3 decision also was a harbinger of doom for a much broader pension bill that was passed and signed into law amid much fanfare and controversy in December 2013. The new decision implies that the court is strongly partial to a literal interpretation of the pension control clause, meaning it absolutely will not allow any reduction in benefits. The new law curtails annual pension increases, sets limits on income eligible for computing pensions and raises some retirement ages, among other things.

But the bill also contains trade-offs in exchange for reducing benefits. That’s a legal principle known as “consideration” that wasn’t tested in the Kanerva case. One example of consideration in the pension reform bill is a reduction the amount that comes out of employee paychecks to pay for pensions.

“The legal arguments we were making were not before the court, so we’re still going to be making those arguments,” said state Rep. Elaine Nekritz, a suburban Democrat who played a major role in steering passage of the pension reform bill passed in December.  “I think two things: There is consideration given in the legislation given for some of the changes we made, so that’s’ one argument, and the Legislature is granted broad powers in the case of emergencies.”

State Sen. Daniel Biss, an Evanston Democrat, who joined Nekritz in sponsoring early pension reform attempts, noted the ruling will add to budget problems and is not an encouraging sign for the broader pension changes approved last year.

“I do think it’s important to separate the two rulings because they are on separate issues,” Biss said. “The question is: What counts as adequate consideration? Does additional revenue driven into the system count as adequate consideration? … The are, really, in a fundamental way, different questions.”

Steve Brown, a spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, declined comment Thursday, as did others who were scrambling to interpet the ruling’s implications.

Speaking to Crain’s Chicago Business, Amanda Kass, budget director and pension specialist from the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, said, “This definitely shuts down the argument that the COLA isn’t part of the benefit.” 

“This is a major victory for members of state retirement systems,” said John Fitzgerald, a partner at Chicago law firm Tabet DiVito & Rothstein LLC who represents retired state teachers and school administrators told Crains. “I expect it will have a very significant effect on pending litigation” over the state’s pension reform law. “It means that the Illinois Supreme Court is giving the pension protection clause the broad and liberal interpretation that the drafters intended.”

Click Here to Read Full Article


From the Newsroom

Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 41 minutes ago

RT @BVallerius: Show-Me Cannabis is holding a free public education event in Hannibal, MO on Aug 4 covering new laws and regs. http://t.co…
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 2 hours, 20 minutes ago

RT @netanyahu: PM Netanyahu spoke w/ UN Sec Gen Ban Ki-moon and asked him to publish photos showing the munitions that were hidden in a UN …
Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 3 hours, 25 minutes ago

Bob Gough on Twitter

Bob Gough 3 hours, 32 minutes ago

RT @bubbaprog: "Was the commissioner lenient enough?" https://t.co/XZxOlpWson