Friday, Apr 24, 2015
Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Trending on the Journal

Related Headlines

Quinn: No pension ‘Plan B’ before court ruling

State employee unions want expedited ruling in pensions suit

Moody’s says Illinois Supreme Court ruling is ‘credit negative’ for state

Candidates need to address pensions

Illinois lawmakers propose fix to pension overhaul

Recent Comments

WarCry - Quincy Mayor, Police & Fire Chiefs disagree over proposed budget cuts - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
I don't see why not. Those very same elected officials (at the state level, anyway) seem to think it's perfectly acceptable to renege on established contracts when they decide it cost too much to honor the commitment. Good for the goose, right? (BTW, this isn't an issue of whether you support unions or not. Even if you hate them and think they screwed everyone over with their contracts,…
1950Brutus - Killing of Americans Deepens Debate Over Use of Drone Strikes - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
How long do you think it will be before we "negotiate" this advantage away.??
qfingers - Quincy Mayor, Police & Fire Chiefs disagree over proposed budget cuts - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
Hmmm...fox guarding the hen house comes to mind. Maybe somebody should start a petition? One to change council to 7 members, the other for healthcare? Paul Havermale is apparently planning to submit a petition of 500 wanting to save the fire station. We ought to be able to beat that if people really want this. Mind you not many people are running for alderman...so taking away benefits may not be the…
migraine_in_qcy - Unemployment falls in Quincy, Adams County - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJournal.com
Because if you're just sucking the welfare teat, you're not collecting unemployment, I assume.
rifleman0311 - Quincy Mayor, Police & Fire Chiefs disagree over proposed budget cuts - Quincy, IL News - QuincyJour
We are discussing ways to save money. This is ONE way to save enough money to keep some public safety intact. Just because you seem to have a vested interest in this proposal doesn't mean it should be ignored! Plenty of other city's get by with only 1 city manager, and a part time mayor. I understand the council has made some bone head decisions, but Righty1, I mean Hackamack, has also waisted…

Most Popular

Quincy Mayor, Police & Fire Chiefs disagree over proposed budget cuts

Wal-Mart said to cut in-store management layer

Wisconsin Shame: " I thought it was a home invasion"

Dreyer: “We think we’re in the right direction”

First bid for QHS expansion awarded

Rauner questions the need for 850-plus school districts in Illinois

Wentzville Obamacare contractor paid 13,000 hours of overtime

Quincy’s Steak ‘n Shake to re-open

Does Illinois Supreme Court decision doom pension reform?

9 months, 2 weeks ago rebootillinois.com

Ruling states that retiree benefits can't be diminished

From rebootillinois.com:

The state’s new pension reform law could be in danger under an Illinois Supreme Court decision that indicates justices see no room for re-interpretation of the Illinois constitution’s pension protection clause.

By a 6-1 decision, the court ruled that health insurance benefits promised to state retirees should be considered pension benefits and, as such, are protected from any reduction by a clause in the state constitution that states, “Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.” (The full decision is posted below.)

The ruling strikes down as unconstitutional a 2012 law that increased health insurance premiums for government retirees. The law established emergency rules that could be invoked “to facilitate the maintenance of the program of group health benefits.”

The emergency was that the premiums paid by retirees were insufficient to maintain the group health plan in which the retirees were enrolled and the state could not afford to finance it.

But the court said the state’s ability to pay is irrelevant. Relying on both the constitutional protection clause and the debate at the 1970 constitutional convention from which the clause evolved, the justices said the state is prohibited from reducing the benefits.

“Defendants contend that their position is supported by the debates at the constitutional convention preceding the adoption of article XIII, section 5. This contention is unpersuasive,” writes Justice Charles Freeman, who penned the decision for the majority. “…In light of the constitutional debates, we have concluded that the provision was aimed at protecting the right to receive the promised retirement benefits, not the adequacy of the funding to pay for them.”

That ruling could blast an added $64 million hole in the state’s already unbalanced budget, noted Sarah Wetmore, Vice President and Research Director for the Civic Federation, a nonpartisan fiscal research organization.

“The Civic Federation is disappointed,” she said. “We supported the changes the state made to its state retiree program to end free health care because we thought that would make it more sustainable over the long term.”

Many observers said the July 3 decision also was a harbinger of doom for a much broader pension bill that was passed and signed into law amid much fanfare and controversy in December 2013. The new decision implies that the court is strongly partial to a literal interpretation of the pension control clause, meaning it absolutely will not allow any reduction in benefits. The new law curtails annual pension increases, sets limits on income eligible for computing pensions and raises some retirement ages, among other things.

But the bill also contains trade-offs in exchange for reducing benefits. That’s a legal principle known as “consideration” that wasn’t tested in the Kanerva case. One example of consideration in the pension reform bill is a reduction the amount that comes out of employee paychecks to pay for pensions.

“The legal arguments we were making were not before the court, so we’re still going to be making those arguments,” said state Rep. Elaine Nekritz, a suburban Democrat who played a major role in steering passage of the pension reform bill passed in December.  “I think two things: There is consideration given in the legislation given for some of the changes we made, so that’s’ one argument, and the Legislature is granted broad powers in the case of emergencies.”

State Sen. Daniel Biss, an Evanston Democrat, who joined Nekritz in sponsoring early pension reform attempts, noted the ruling will add to budget problems and is not an encouraging sign for the broader pension changes approved last year.

“I do think it’s important to separate the two rulings because they are on separate issues,” Biss said. “The question is: What counts as adequate consideration? Does additional revenue driven into the system count as adequate consideration? … The are, really, in a fundamental way, different questions.”

Steve Brown, a spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, declined comment Thursday, as did others who were scrambling to interpet the ruling’s implications.

Speaking to Crain’s Chicago Business, Amanda Kass, budget director and pension specialist from the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, said, “This definitely shuts down the argument that the COLA isn’t part of the benefit.” 

“This is a major victory for members of state retirement systems,” said John Fitzgerald, a partner at Chicago law firm Tabet DiVito & Rothstein LLC who represents retired state teachers and school administrators told Crains. “I expect it will have a very significant effect on pending litigation” over the state’s pension reform law. “It means that the Illinois Supreme Court is giving the pension protection clause the broad and liberal interpretation that the drafters intended.”

Click Here to Read Full Article


From the Newsroom

QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 2 hours, 26 minutes ago

Pepsi to ditch aspartame in Diet Pepsi http://t.co/YrVj03H2UX
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 4 hours, 28 minutes ago

Guthrie fires second round 69 at Zurich Classic-stands at 3 under par http://t.co/xB5jNlsJaL
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 4 hours, 28 minutes ago

IL budget cuts include $106 million less for Medicaid - Part of budget fix for fiscal year http://t.co/iYnDaH4rMA
QuincyJournal on Twitter

QuincyJournal 6 hours, 28 minutes ago

The war crippling the world's biggest oil producer http://t.co/iuy4XNfYL8